Impact-Site-Verification: 0eedbe8d-4e05-4893-8456-85377301e322

Intel vs AMD (INTC vs AMD): Returns, Risk & Volatility (2026)

Last updated: February 25, 2026

Gale Finance Team
Written by Gale Finance Team
Sid Kalla
Reviewed by Sid Kalla CFA Charterholder
Quick answer

Which is a better investment: INTC or AMD?

Over the past year, AMD outperformed (+103.0% vs +111.9%) with a Sharpe ratio of 1.43.

Total Return
INTC +103.0%
AMD WIN +111.9%
Sharpe Ratio
INTC 1.33
AMD WIN 1.43
Annualized Volatility
INTC 67.0%
AMD WIN 64.2%
Max Drawdown
INTC WIN -30.1%
AMD -31.9%

Analysis period: 2025-02-27 to 2026-02-25

INTC Total Return
+103.0%
AMD Total Return
+111.9%

Relative Performance of INTC vs AMD (Normalized to 100)

INTC AMD

Normalized to 100 at start date for comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Total Return: INTC delivered a +103.0% total return, while AMD returned +111.9% over the same period. AMD outperformed on total returns.
  • Risk-Adjusted Return (Sharpe Ratio): AMD had a higher Sharpe (1.43 vs 1.33), indicating better risk-adjusted performance.
  • Volatility (Annualized): INTC was more volatile, with 67.0% annualized volatility, versus 64.2% for AMD.
  • Maximum Drawdown: INTC's maximum drawdown was -30.1%, while AMD experienced a deeper drawdown of -31.9%.
  • Tail Risk (VaR & Expected Shortfall): At the 5% level (daily log returns), INTC's VaR was -6.39% and its Expected Shortfall (CVaR) was -8.49%; AMD's were -5.60% and -8.43%. VaR is the cutoff; Expected Shortfall is the average move on the worst days.
  • Skew & Kurtosis: Skew: INTC 0.53 vs AMD 0.70. Excess kurtosis: INTC 4.64 vs AMD 7.56. Negative skew leans downside; higher excess kurtosis means fatter tails.
  • Tail Days & Extremes: 2σ tail days (down/up): INTC 3/7, AMD 7/7. Worst day: INTC -17.03% (2026-01-23) vs AMD -17.31% (2026-02-04). Best day: INTC +22.77% (2025-09-18) vs AMD +23.82% (2025-04-09).
  • Risk ratios: Sortino - INTC: 2.26 vs. AMD: 2.42 , Calmar - INTC: 3.46 vs. AMD: 3.54 , Sterling - INTC: 4.74 vs. AMD: 4.23 , Treynor - INTC: 0.59 vs. AMD: 0.44 , Ulcer Index - INTC: 14.06% vs. AMD: 12.59%

Intel vs AMD Correlation

0.29 Average Correlation

Intel and AMD are weakly correlated over the past year. With a correlation of 0.29, these assets show meaningful independence, offering diversification benefits when held together.

For portfolio construction, this weak correlation suggests that combining INTC and AMD could reduce overall portfolio variance. However, correlations can increase during market stress.

Metric Value
Current (30-day) 0.39
Average (full period) 0.29
Minimum -0.35
Maximum 0.83

Correlation measures how closely two assets move together. Values near +1 indicate strong co-movement, near 0 indicates independence, and negative values indicate inverse movement.

Investment Comparison

If you invested $10,000 in each asset on February 27, 2025:

INTC $20,303.16 +103.0%
AMD $21,189.83 +111.9%

Difference: $886.67 (AMD ahead)

Intel and AMD: Risk Analysis

Intel experienced its maximum drawdown of -30.1% from 2025-03-18 to 2025-04-08. It took 163 days to recover.

AMD experienced its maximum drawdown of -31.9% from 2025-03-25 to 2025-04-08. It took 36 days to recover.

Smaller drawdowns and faster recoveries indicate lower downside risk and greater resilience during market stress.

Sharpe Ratio of INTC and AMD

INTC Sharpe Ratio
1.33
AMD Sharpe Ratio
1.43

Sharpe ratio measures return per unit of risk (volatility). A higher Sharpe indicates better risk-adjusted performance. AMD had a higher Sharpe (1.43 vs 1.33), indicating better risk-adjusted performance.

A Sharpe above 1.0 is generally considered good, above 2.0 is excellent. Negative Sharpe means the asset underperformed the risk-free rate. Calculated on each asset's full 365-day lookback of available prices and annualized using the asset calendar (365 for crypto, 252 trading days for equities/ETFs/metals).

Sortino Ratio of INTC and AMD

INTC Sortino Ratio
2.26
AMD Sortino Ratio
2.42

Sortino ratio measures return per unit of downside risk. Unlike Sharpe, it only counts downside deviation (returns below the target return). AMD had better downside-adjusted returns.

A higher Sortino is better. It's useful when upside volatility is common (crypto is the obvious example). Downside deviation: INTC 39.6% vs AMD 38.0%. Calculated on each asset's full 365-day lookback of available prices, using the daily risk-free rate as the target return, and annualized using the asset calendar (365 for crypto, 252 trading days for equities/ETFs/metals).

Calmar Ratio of INTC and AMD

INTC Calmar Ratio
3.46
AMD Calmar Ratio
3.54

Calmar ratio compares CAGR to maximum drawdown. Higher Calmar means more return per unit of worst drawdown. AMD posted the higher Calmar ratio.

Calmar is computed on each asset's full 365-day lookback and uses the max drawdown over that same window.

Sterling Ratio of INTC and AMD

INTC Sterling Ratio
4.74
AMD Sterling Ratio
4.23

Sterling ratio measures excess return per unit of average drawdown (typically drawdowns worse than 10%). INTC posted the higher Sterling ratio.

Sterling uses average drawdown events deeper than 10% and subtracts the risk-free rate to report excess return.

Treynor Ratio of INTC and AMD

INTC Treynor Ratio
0.59
AMD Treynor Ratio
0.44

Treynor ratio measures excess return per unit of market risk (beta) instead of total volatility. INTC posted the higher Treynor ratio.

Treynor uses beta vs the S&P 500 (SPY) on shared dates and the average 3-month Treasury rate as the risk-free rate.

Ulcer Index of INTC and AMD

INTC Ulcer Index
14.06%
AMD Ulcer Index
12.59%

Ulcer Index captures drawdown depth and duration. Lower Ulcer Index means less drawdown pain. AMD had the lower Ulcer Index (less drawdown pain).

Ulcer Index is computed from each asset's drawdown series over the full lookback window.

Tail Risk & Distribution Shape (1-Year): Intel vs. AMD

This section looks at the shape of daily returns, not just the average. Tail stats are computed per asset on its own daily series (crypto includes weekends). We use daily log returns ln(PtPt1)\ln\left(\frac{P_t}{P_{t-1}}\right) so multi-day moves add cleanly.

Definitions: Value at Risk (VaR), Expected Shortfall, skew, kurtosis, and fat tails.

Metric (1-Year) INTC AMD
5% VaR (daily log return) -6.39% -5.60%
5% Expected Shortfall (CVaR) -8.49% (worst 13 days) -8.43% (worst 13 days)
Skew 0.53 0.70
Excess kurtosis 4.64 7.56
2σ tail days (down / up) 3 / 7 7 / 7
Worst day -17.03% (2026-01-23) -17.31% (2026-02-04)
Best day +22.77% (2025-09-18) +23.82% (2025-04-09)

Downside co-moves (2σ) — 1-Year

Computed on shared dates only (n=249). A “2σ downside move” means a shared-close log return more than 2 standard deviations below that asset’s own mean on this shared-date series. Dates below show simple returns (%) for readability.

When AMD has a big down day, INTC also does
14.3%
1 / 7 days
When INTC has a big down day, AMD also does
33.3%
1 / 3 days
Show downside tail dates

Dates below are shared-date observations. The “Date” is the period end (close). Tail thresholds are computed on log returns, but the table shows simple returns (%) for readability. Returns are computed from the previous shared close to this one (for example, Friday → Monday includes weekend moves).

Days when both INTC and AMD had a big down day (2σ)

Date (interval) INTC AMD
2025-04-04 -11.50% -8.57%

Days when INTC had a big down day

Date (interval) INTC AMD
2025-04-04 -11.50% -8.57%
2025-07-25 -8.53% +2.68%
2026-01-23 -17.03% +2.35%

Days when AMD had a big down day

Date (interval) INTC AMD
2025-04-03 +2.05% -8.90%
2025-04-04 -11.50% -8.57%
2025-04-10 -7.66% -8.41%
2025-04-16 -3.12% -7.35%
2025-10-10 -3.78% -7.72%
2025-11-20 -4.24% -7.84%
2026-02-04 -1.32% -17.31%

Read this as “how ugly the ugly days get”, not as a precise forecast. One-year samples are small, so tail estimates are inherently noisy.

Intel vs AMD Volatility (INTC vs AMD)

INTC Volatility
67.0%
±4.22% daily
AMD Volatility
64.2%
±4.05% daily
Typical daily swing
INTC
±4.22%
AMD
±4.05%

Intel's annualized volatility of 67.0% means it typically moves ±4.22% on any given day.

AMD's annualized volatility of 64.2% means it typically moves ±4.05% on any given day.

INTC's higher volatility means a wider path to returns — this can be attractive for tactical, shorter-term exposure, while AMD's smoother profile may better suit long-term allocators seeking steadier growth.

For comparison, the S&P 500 typically has 15-18% annualized volatility, translating to roughly ±1% daily moves. Higher volatility means larger potential gains but also larger potential losses.

Intel vs AMD Performance Over Time

Metric INTC AMD
30 Days 10.3% -16.1%
90 Days 27.4% -1.6%
180 Days 92.5% 29.7%
1 Year 103% 111.9%

Shorter time frames can show different leaders as market conditions change. Consider your investment horizon when comparing performance.

Full Comparison of Intel vs. AMD (1-Year)

Metric INTC AMD
Total Return +103.0% +111.9%
Annualized Volatility 67.0% 64.2%
Sharpe Ratio 1.33 1.43
Sortino Ratio 2.26 2.42
Calmar Ratio 3.46 3.54
Sterling Ratio 4.74 4.23
Treynor Ratio 0.59 0.44
Ulcer Index 14.06% 12.59%
Max Drawdown -30.1% -31.9%
Avg Correlation to S&P 500 0.39 0.51
5% VaR (daily log return) -6.39% -5.60%
5% Expected Shortfall (CVaR) -8.49% -8.43%
Skew 0.53 0.70
Excess kurtosis 4.64 7.56
2σ tail days (down / up) 3 / 7 7 / 7
Audit this calculation

Formulas, inputs, and conventions used to compute the metrics on this page.

Inputs & conventions

Shared window for pair metrics
2025-02-27 → 2026-02-25 (last shared close).
Rolling correlation sample (shared closes)
220 rolling 30-day values (from 249 shared daily returns).
Annualization (days/year)
INTC: 252 days/year; AMD: 252 days/year.
Risk-free rate
Uses the 3-month U.S. Treasury yield (FRED: DGS3MO), averaged over each asset’s window:
  • INTC: 4.20% over 2025-02-27 → 2026-02-25.
  • AMD: 4.20% over 2025-02-27 → 2026-02-25.
Volatility drag (rule of thumb)
Estimated from annualized volatility (simple returns). For the log-return framing, see Log returns.
  • INTC: ≈ -22.4%/yr
  • AMD: ≈ -20.6%/yr
Data alignment
No forward fill. Correlation and tail co-moves are computed on shared closes only.
For cross-calendar pairs (e.g., crypto vs stocks), weekend/holiday moves roll into the next shared close.
Return conventions
Volatility/Sharpe/Sortino use simple daily returns. Tail-risk uses daily log returns for distribution stats (but tables show simple returns). Log returns.

Formulas

Daily simple return
rt=PtPt11r_t = \frac{P_t}{P_{t-1}} - 1
σann=σ(rt)A\sigma_{ann} = \sigma(r_t)\sqrt{A}
drag12σann2\text{drag} \approx \tfrac{1}{2}\sigma_{ann}^2
S=Arˉrfσ(rt)AS = \frac{A\,\bar{r} - r_f}{\sigma(r_t)\sqrt{A}}
So=ArˉrfE[min(0,rtrf/A)2]ASo = \frac{A\,\bar{r} - r_f}{\sqrt{\mathbb{E}[\min(0,\,r_t - r_f/A)^2]}\,\sqrt{A}}
MDD=mint(PtmaxstPs1)MDD = \min_t\left(\frac{P_t}{\max_{s \le t} P_s} - 1\right)
ρ=cov(rA,rB)σAσB\rho = \frac{\operatorname{cov}(r^A,\,r^B)}{\sigma_A\,\sigma_B}
t=ln(PtPt1)\ell_t = \ln\left(\frac{P_t}{P_{t-1}}\right)
Notation
PtP_t
Price on day t.
rtr_t
Simple daily return.
t\ell_t
Log daily return.
rˉ\bar{r}
Average daily return.
σ(rt)\sigma(r_t)
Standard deviation of daily returns.
AA
Annualization factor (days/year).
rfr_f
Annual risk-free rate.

Intel vs AMD: Frequently Asked Questions

Which has higher volatility: INTC or AMD?

INTC showed higher volatility at 67.0% annualized, compared to 64.2% for AMD Over the past year. Higher volatility means larger price swings in both directions.

Does INTC provide diversification when held with AMD?

INTC and AMD are weakly correlated over the past year, with an average correlation of 0.29. This weak correlation suggests meaningful diversification benefits when held together.

How bad are the worst 5% days for INTC vs AMD?

Over the past year, INTC's 5% VaR was -6.39% and its 5% Expected Shortfall was -8.49% (worst 13 days). AMD's were -5.60% and -8.43% (worst 13 days).

Do INTC and AMD crash together on bad days?

On shared dates (n=249), when AMD has a 2σ down day, INTC also does 14.3% (1/7 days). In the other direction, when INTC has one, AMD also does 33.3% (1/3 days).

Which has better risk-adjusted returns: INTC or AMD?

AMD showed better risk-adjusted performance with a Sharpe ratio of 1.43 versus INTC's 1.33 Over the past year.

Can INTC and AMD be combined in a portfolio?

Yes, though allocation sizing matters. Their weak correlation could meaningfully reduce overall portfolio variance. INTC's higher volatility (67.0%) means even small allocations can materially impact overall portfolio risk.