Analysis period: 2022-01-01 to 2022-12-31
Relative Performance of BTC vs XAU (Normalized to 100)
Normalized to 100 at start date for comparison
Key Takeaways
- Total Return: BTC delivered a -64.3% total return, while XAU returned +1.2% over the same period. XAU outperformed on total returns.
- Risk-Adjusted Return (Sharpe Ratio): Both Sharpe ratios were negative (XAU -0.15 vs BTC -1.38), meaning both underperformed the risk-free rate; XAU was less negative.
- Volatility (Annualized): BTC was more volatile, with 63.8% annualized volatility, versus 14.8% for XAU.
- Maximum Drawdown: XAU's maximum drawdown was -20.8%, while BTC experienced a deeper drawdown of -66.7%.
- Tail Risk (VaR & Expected Shortfall): At the 5% level (daily log returns), BTC's VaR was -5.80% and its Expected Shortfall (CVaR) was -9.10%; XAU's were -1.61% and -1.98%. VaR is the cutoff; Expected Shortfall is the average move on the worst days.
- Skew & Kurtosis: Skew: BTC -0.59 vs XAU 0.04. Excess kurtosis: BTC 4.67 vs XAU 0.78. Negative skew leans downside; higher excess kurtosis means fatter tails.
- Tail Days & Extremes: 2σ tail days (down/up): BTC 12/9, XAU 5/9. Worst day: BTC -15.97% (2022-06-13) vs XAU -2.83% (2022-03-09). Best day: BTC +14.54% (2022-02-28) vs XAU +3.13% (2022-11-04).
- Risk ratios: Sortino - BTC: -1.81 vs. XAU: -0.21 , Calmar - BTC: N/A vs. XAU: N/A , Sterling - BTC: N/A vs. XAU: N/A , Treynor - BTC: N/A vs. XAU: N/A , Ulcer Index - BTC: N/A vs. XAU: N/A
Bitcoin vs Gold Correlation
Bitcoin and Gold were weakly correlated in 2022. With a correlation of 0.17, these assets showed meaningful independence, offering diversification benefits when held together.
For portfolio construction, this weak correlation suggests that combining BTC and XAU could reduce overall portfolio variance. However, correlations can increase during market stress.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Current (30-day) | 0.36 |
| Average (full period) | 0.17 |
| Minimum | -0.46 |
| Maximum | 0.65 |
Correlation measures how closely two assets move together. Values near +1 indicate strong co-movement, near 0 indicates independence, and negative values indicate inverse movement.
Investment Comparison
If you invested $10,000 in each asset on January 1, 2022:
Difference: $6,549.354 (XAU ahead)
Trade BTC or XAU
Access these assets on trusted platforms.
Bitcoin and Gold: Risk Analysis
Bitcoin experienced its maximum drawdown of -66.7% from 2022-03-29 to 2022-11-21. It has not yet recovered to its previous peak.
Gold experienced its maximum drawdown of -20.8% from 2022-03-08 to 2022-09-26. It has not yet recovered to its previous peak.
Smaller drawdowns and faster recoveries indicate lower downside risk and greater resilience during market stress.
Sharpe Ratio of BTC and XAU
Sharpe ratio measures return per unit of risk (volatility). A higher Sharpe indicates better risk-adjusted performance. Both Sharpe ratios were negative (XAU -0.15 vs BTC -1.38), meaning both underperformed the risk-free rate; XAU was less negative.
A Sharpe above 1.0 is generally considered good, above 2.0 is excellent. Negative Sharpe means the asset underperformed the risk-free rate. Calculated on each asset's full 365-day lookback of available prices and annualized using the asset calendar (365 for crypto, 252 trading days for equities/ETFs/metals).
Sortino Ratio of BTC and XAU
Sortino ratio measures return per unit of downside risk. Unlike Sharpe, it only counts downside deviation (returns below the target return). XAU had better downside-adjusted returns.
A higher Sortino is better. It's useful when upside volatility is common (crypto is the obvious example). Downside deviation: BTC 48.6% vs XAU 10.5%. Calculated on each asset's full 365-day lookback of available prices, using the daily risk-free rate as the target return, and annualized using the asset calendar (365 for crypto, 252 trading days for equities/ETFs/metals).
Tail Risk & Distribution Shape (2022): Bitcoin vs. Gold
This section looks at the shape of daily returns, not just the average. Tail stats are computed per asset on its own daily series (crypto includes weekends). We use daily log returns so multi-day moves add cleanly.
Definitions: Value at Risk (VaR), Expected Shortfall, skew, kurtosis, and fat tails.
| Metric (2022) | BTC | XAU |
|---|---|---|
| 5% VaR (daily log return) | -5.80% | -1.61% |
| 5% Expected Shortfall (CVaR) | -9.10% (worst 19 days) | -1.98% (worst 13 days) |
| Skew | -0.59 | 0.04 |
| Excess kurtosis | 4.67 | 0.78 |
| 2σ tail days (down / up) | 12 / 9 | 5 / 9 |
| Worst day | -15.97% (2022-06-13) | -2.83% (2022-03-09) |
| Best day | +14.54% (2022-02-28) | +3.13% (2022-11-04) |
Downside co-moves (2σ) — 2022
Computed on shared dates only (n=257). A “2σ downside move” means a shared-close log return more than 2 standard deviations below that asset’s own mean on this shared-date series. Dates below show simple returns (%) for readability.
Show downside tail dates
Dates below are shared-date observations. The “Date” is the period end (close). Tail thresholds are computed on log returns, but the table shows simple returns (%) for readability. Returns are computed from the previous shared close to this one (for example, Friday → Monday includes weekend moves).
Days when both BTC and XAU had a big down day (2σ)
| Date (interval) | BTC | XAU |
|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-10 → 2022-06-13 | -22.68% | -2.80% |
Days when BTC had a big down day
| Date (interval) | BTC | XAU |
|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-21 | -10.38% | -0.43% |
| 2022-05-06 → 2022-05-09 | -15.94% | -1.44% |
| 2022-06-10 → 2022-06-13 | -22.68% | -2.80% |
| 2022-06-16 | -9.71% | +1.25% |
| 2022-08-19 | -10.06% | -0.67% |
| 2022-09-13 | -9.27% | -1.28% |
| 2022-11-08 | -10.01% | +2.21% |
| 2022-11-09 | -14.35% | -0.31% |
Days when XAU had a big down day
| Date (interval) | BTC | XAU |
|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-09 | +8.38% | -2.83% |
| 2022-03-15 | -0.83% | -1.92% |
| 2022-06-10 → 2022-06-13 | -22.68% | -2.80% |
| 2022-07-05 | -0.20% | -2.39% |
| 2022-09-15 | -2.67% | -1.94% |
Read this as “how ugly the ugly days get”, not as a precise forecast. One-year samples are small, so tail estimates are inherently noisy.
Full Comparison of Bitcoin vs. Gold (2022)
| Metric | BTC | XAU |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return | -64.3% | +1.2% |
| Annualized Volatility | 63.8% | 14.8% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -1.38 | -0.15 |
| Sortino Ratio | -1.81 | -0.21 |
| Calmar Ratio | N/A | N/A |
| Sterling Ratio | N/A | N/A |
| Treynor Ratio | N/A | N/A |
| Ulcer Index | N/A | N/A |
| Max Drawdown | -66.7% | -20.8% |
| Avg Correlation to S&P 500 | N/A | N/A |
| 5% VaR (daily log return) | -5.80% | -1.61% |
| 5% Expected Shortfall (CVaR) | -9.10% | -1.98% |
| Skew | -0.59 | 0.04 |
| Excess kurtosis | 4.67 | 0.78 |
| 2σ tail days (down / up) | 12 / 9 | 5 / 9 |
Audit this calculation
Formulas, inputs, and conventions used to compute the metrics on this page.
Inputs & conventions
- Shared window for pair metrics
- 2022-01-01 → 2022-12-31 (last shared close).
- Annualization (days/year)
- BTC: 365 days/year; XAU: 252 days/year.
- Risk-free rate
- Uses the 3-month U.S. Treasury yield (FRED: DGS3MO), averaged over each asset’s window:
- BTC: 4.50%.
- XAU: 4.50%.
- Volatility drag (rule of thumb)
- Estimated from annualized volatility (simple returns). For the log-return framing, see Log returns.
- BTC: ≈ -20.4%/yr
- XAU: ≈ -1.1%/yr
- Data alignment
- No forward fill. Correlation and tail co-moves are computed on shared closes only. For cross-calendar pairs (e.g., crypto vs stocks), weekend/holiday moves roll into the next shared close.
- Return conventions
- Volatility/Sharpe/Sortino use simple daily returns. Tail-risk uses daily log returns for distribution stats (but tables show simple returns). Log returns.
Formulas
- Price on day t.
- Simple daily return.
- Log daily return.
- Average daily return.
- Standard deviation of daily returns.
- Annualization factor (days/year).
- Annual risk-free rate.
Bitcoin vs Gold: Frequently Asked Questions
Which had higher volatility: BTC or XAU?
BTC showed higher volatility at 63.8% annualized, compared to 14.8% for XAU During 2022. Higher volatility meant larger price swings in both directions.
Did BTC provide diversification when held with XAU?
BTC and XAU were weakly correlated in 2022, with an average correlation of 0.17. This weak correlation suggested meaningful diversification benefits when held together.
How bad are the worst 5% days for BTC vs XAU?
During 2022, BTC's 5% VaR was -5.80% and its 5% Expected Shortfall was -9.10% (worst 19 days). XAU's were -1.61% and -1.98% (worst 13 days).
Do BTC and XAU crash together on bad days?
On shared dates (n=257), when XAU has a 2σ down day, BTC also does 20.0% (1/5 days). In the other direction, when BTC has one, XAU also does 12.5% (1/8 days).
Which had better risk-adjusted returns: BTC or XAU?
Both assets posted negative Sharpe ratios During 2022 (XAU -0.15 vs BTC -1.38), meaning both underperformed the risk-free rate; XAU was less negative.
Could BTC and XAU have been combined in a portfolio?
Yes, though allocation sizing mattered. Their weak correlation could have meaningfully reduced overall portfolio variance. BTC's higher volatility (63.8%) meant even small allocations can materially impact overall portfolio risk.