Marvell vs Credo (MRVL vs CRDO) 2026: Stock Returns, Risk & Volatility

Q: Which is a better investment: MRVL or CRDO?

Over the past year, CRDO looks like the better investment: it had higher total return (CRDO +324.8% vs MRVL +181.6%) and a higher Sharpe ratio (CRDO 2.15 vs MRVL 2.04). On risk, MRVL was less volatile (MRVL 57.6% vs CRDO 81.8%), MRVL had a smaller max drawdown (MRVL -26.4% vs CRDO -53.6%), and MRVL had less severe losses on the worst 5% of days (Expected Shortfall of MRVL -7.38% vs CRDO -10.58%).

Written by Gale Finance Team

Reviewed by Sid Kalla CFA Charterholder

Quick answer

Which is a better investment: MRVL or CRDO?

Over the past year, CRDO outperformed MRVL. CRDO returned +324.8% compared with MRVL’s +181.6%. CRDO had the better risk-adjusted return, with a Sharpe ratio of 2.15 versus MRVL’s 2.04. MRVL was less volatile than CRDO, and MRVL had a smaller max drawdown than CRDO.

Total Return

MRVL +181.6%

CRDO +324.8%

Sharpe Ratio

MRVL 2.04

CRDO 2.15

Annualized Volatility

MRVL 57.6%

CRDO 81.8%

Max Drawdown

MRVL -26.4%

CRDO -53.6%

Metric winners: Total Return: CRDO; Sharpe Ratio: CRDO; Annualized Volatility: MRVL (less volatile); Max Drawdown: MRVL (smaller drawdown).

MRVL Total Return

↑ +181.6%

CRDO Total Return

↑ +324.8%

Relative Performance of MRVL vs CRDO (Normalized to 100)

MRVL CRDO

Normalized to 100 at start date for comparison

Trade MRVL or CRDO

Access these assets on trusted platforms.

Hyperliquid

Trade perpetual futures exposure where supportedMRVLCRDOTrade on Hyperliquid

Binance

Trade futures exposure on a global exchange where supportedMRVLCRDOTrade on Binance

Affiliate disclosure

Key Takeaways

Total Return: MRVL delivered a +181.6% total return, while CRDO returned +324.8% over the same period. CRDO outperformed on total returns.
Risk-Adjusted Return (Sharpe Ratio): CRDO had a higher Sharpe (2.15 vs 2.04), indicating better risk-adjusted performance.
Volatility (Annualized): CRDO was more volatile, with 81.8% annualized volatility, versus 57.6% for MRVL.
Maximum Drawdown: MRVL's maximum drawdown was -26.4%, while CRDO experienced a deeper drawdown of -53.6%.
Tail Risk (VaR & Expected Shortfall): At the 5% level (daily log returns), MRVL's VaR was -4.27% and its Expected Shortfall (CVaR) was -7.38%; CRDO's were -7.50% and -10.58%. VaR is the cutoff; Expected Shortfall is the average move on the worst days.
Skew & Kurtosis: Skew: MRVL -0.26 vs CRDO -0.06. Excess kurtosis: MRVL 5.45 vs CRDO 0.64. Negative skew leans downside; higher excess kurtosis means fatter tails.
Tail Days & Extremes: 2σ tail days (down/up): MRVL 5/5, CRDO 6/7. Worst day: MRVL -18.60% (2025-08-29) vs CRDO -14.81% (2026-03-03). Best day: MRVL +18.35% (2026-03-06) vs CRDO +18.73% (2026-04-14).
Risk ratios: Sortino - MRVL: 3.29 vs. CRDO: 3.47 , Calmar - MRVL: 6.96 vs. CRDO: 6.13 , Sterling - MRVL: 9.74 vs. CRDO: 12.20 , Treynor - MRVL: 0.54 vs. CRDO: 0.58 , Ulcer Index - MRVL: 11.41% vs. CRDO: 22.02%

Investment Comparison

If you invested $10,000 in each asset on April 25, 2025:

MRVL $28,162.3 +181.6%

CRDO $42,477.11 +324.8%

Difference: $14,314.81 (CRDO ahead)

Marvell vs Credo Performance Over Time

Metric	MRVL	CRDO
30 Days	79.3%	85%
90 Days	106.4%	39.3%
180 Days	96.9%	19.3%
1 Year	181.6%	324.8%

Shorter time frames can show different leaders as market conditions change. Consider your investment horizon when comparing performance.

Marvell vs Credo Correlation

Average Correlation

moderately correlated

0.43

Current (30-day) 0.47

30-day rolling range -0.13 to +0.73

Marvell and Credo are moderately correlated over the past year. With a correlation of 0.43, these assets show moderate co-movement, offering some diversification when held together.

For portfolio construction, this moderate correlation offers some diversification benefit, though the assets still tend to move together during major market moves.

Metric	Value
Current (30-day)	0.47
Average (full period)	0.43
Minimum (30-day rolling)	-0.13
Maximum (30-day rolling)	0.73

Correlation measures how closely two assets move together. Values near +1 indicate strong co-movement, near 0 indicates independence, and negative values indicate inverse movement. Current, minimum, and maximum figures are 30-day rolling correlations on shared daily returns.

Drawdown

Maximum Drawdown

MRVL

-26.4%

CRDO

-53.6%

Marvell experienced its maximum drawdown of -26.4% from 2025-12-03 to 2026-02-04. It took 56 days to recover.

Credo experienced its maximum drawdown of -53.6% from 2025-12-03 to 2026-03-30. It took 23 days to recover.

Smaller drawdowns and faster recoveries indicate lower downside risk and greater resilience during market stress.

Marvell vs Credo Volatility (MRVL vs CRDO)

MRVL Volatility

57.6%

±3.63% 1-day vol

CRDO Volatility

81.8%

±5.15% 1-day vol

1-day volatility (1σ)

MRVL

±3.63%

CRDO

±5.15%

Marvell's 57.6% annualized volatility translates to about ±3.63% one-standard-deviation daily volatility.

Credo's 81.8% annualized volatility translates to about ±5.15% one-standard-deviation daily volatility.

CRDO had the wider volatility profile over this window. That means its day-to-day return distribution was broader; MRVL was calmer, but lower volatility does not by itself mean better returns.

Treat the ± daily figure as a one-standard-deviation estimate from historical returns, not a forecast or expected absolute daily move. For context, 15-18% annualized volatility is roughly ±1% one-standard-deviation daily volatility.

Risk-adjusted ratios

Sharpe Ratio of MRVL and CRDO

Sharpe Ratio: MRVL vs. CRDO

Return per total volatility

Sharpe gives us excess return per unit of risk. Upside and downside volatility both count as risk.

Higher is better

excess return / total volatility

Formula

\displaystyle \mathrm{Sharpe} = \frac{\mathbb{E}[R] - R_f}{\sigma_R}

Sharpe ratio measures return per unit of risk (volatility). A higher Sharpe indicates better risk-adjusted performance. CRDO had a higher Sharpe (2.15 vs 2.04), indicating better risk-adjusted performance.

A Sharpe above 1.0 is generally considered good, above 2.0 is excellent. Negative Sharpe means the asset underperformed the risk-free rate. Calculated on each asset's full 365-day lookback of available prices and annualized using the asset calendar (365 for crypto, 252 trading days for equities/ETFs/metals).

Sortino Ratio of MRVL and CRDO

Sortino Ratio: MRVL vs. CRDO

Return per downside volatility

Sortino keeps the return-over-risk idea, but only returns below the target rate count as volatility.

Higher is better

excess return / downside volatility

Formula

\displaystyle \mathrm{Sortino} = \frac{\mathbb{E}[R] - R_f}{\sigma_{\mathrm{down}}}

Sortino ratio measures return per unit of downside risk. Unlike Sharpe, it only counts downside deviation (returns below the target return). CRDO had better downside-adjusted returns.

A higher Sortino is better. It's useful when upside volatility is common (crypto is the obvious example). Downside deviation: MRVL 35.7% vs CRDO 50.6%. Calculated on each asset's full 365-day lookback of available prices, using the daily risk-free rate as the target return, and annualized using the asset calendar (365 for crypto, 252 trading days for equities/ETFs/metals).

Calmar Ratio of MRVL and CRDO

Calmar Ratio: MRVL vs. CRDO

CAGR per worst drawdown

Calmar compares CAGR against the single deepest peak-to-trough loss over the period.

Higher is better

CAGR / max drawdown

Formula

\displaystyle \mathrm{Calmar} = \frac{\mathrm{CAGR}}{|\mathrm{MaxDD}|}

Calmar ratio compares CAGR to maximum drawdown. Higher Calmar means more return per unit of worst drawdown. MRVL posted the higher Calmar ratio.

Calmar is computed on each asset's full 365-day lookback and uses the max drawdown over that same window.

Sterling Ratio of MRVL and CRDO

Sterling Ratio: MRVL vs. CRDO

Return per average drawdown

Sterling smooths the drawdown penalty by using average drawdown events instead of only the worst one.

Higher is better

excess annual return / average deep drawdown

Formula

\displaystyle \mathrm{Sterling} = \frac{\mathrm{CAGR} - R_f}{\overline{D}_{>10\%}}

Sterling ratio measures excess return per unit of average drawdown (typically drawdowns worse than 10%). CRDO posted the higher Sterling ratio.

Sterling uses average drawdown events deeper than 10% and subtracts the risk-free rate to report excess return.

Treynor Ratio of MRVL and CRDO

Treynor Ratio: MRVL vs. CRDO

Excess return per market beta

Treynor divides excess annualized return by beta — the sensitivity of the asset to broad-market moves. The slope shown is each asset’s beta vs SPY.

Higher is better

excess return / market beta

Formula

\displaystyle \mathrm{Treynor} = \frac{\mathbb{E}[R] - R_f}{\beta}

Treynor ratio measures excess return per unit of market risk (beta) instead of total volatility. CRDO posted the higher Treynor ratio.

Treynor uses beta vs the S&P 500 (SPY) on shared dates and the average 3-month Treasury rate as the risk-free rate.

Ulcer Index of MRVL and CRDO

Ulcer Index: MRVL vs. CRDO

Drawdown pain

Ulcer Index is a risk index, not a return-over-risk ratio. Lower means smaller and shorter drawdowns.

Lower is better

root-mean-square drawdown

Formula

\displaystyle \mathrm{UI} = \sqrt{\mathbb{E}[D_t^2]}

Ulcer Index captures drawdown depth and duration. Lower Ulcer Index means less drawdown pain. MRVL had the lower Ulcer Index (less drawdown pain).

Ulcer Index is computed from each asset's drawdown series over the full lookback window.

Tail Risk & Distribution Shape (1-Year): Marvell vs. Credo

This section looks at the shape of daily returns, not just the average. Tail stats are computed per asset on its own daily series (crypto includes weekends). We use daily log returns $\ln\left(\frac{P_t}{P_{t-1}}\right)$ so multi-day moves add cleanly.

Definitions: Value at Risk (VaR), Expected Shortfall, skew, kurtosis, and fat tails.

Tail Risk & Distribution Shape: MRVL vs. CRDO (1-Year)

Actual daily return tails

The bars are real daily log-return observations from the article window. Darker bars are observations at or beyond each asset’s 5% VaR cutoff.

Observed returns

VaR marks the 5th percentile loss cutoff; Expected Shortfall averages the observations beyond that cutoff.

Formula

\displaystyle \mathrm{VaR}_{5\%}=Q_{0.05}(r_t),\quad \mathrm{ES}_{5\%}=\mathbb{E}[r_t\mid r_t\le \mathrm{VaR}_{5\%}]

Metric (1-Year)	MRVL	CRDO
5% VaR (daily log return)	-4.27%	-7.50%
5% Expected Shortfall (CVaR)	-7.38% (worst 13 days)	-10.58% (worst 13 days)
Skew	-0.26	-0.06
Excess kurtosis	5.45	0.64
2σ tail days (down / up)	5 / 5	6 / 7
Worst day	-18.60% (2025-08-29)	-14.81% (2026-03-03)
Best day	+18.35% (2026-03-06)	+18.73% (2026-04-14)

Downside co-moves (2σ) — 1-Year

Computed on shared dates only (n=249). A “2σ downside move” means a shared-close log return more than 2 standard deviations below that asset’s own mean on this shared-date series. Dates below show simple returns (%) for readability.

Downside co-move map: MRVL vs. CRDO (2σ)

Shared-close daily returns

Dots mark actual downside days: asset-colored dots are one-sided downside moves, and red dots are joint downside days. Grey dots add sampled shared-return context when available. The shaded lower-left zone shows where both MRVL and CRDO crossed their own 2σ downside threshold.

2σ

Show downside tail dates

Dates below are shared-date observations. The “Date” is the period end (close). Tail thresholds are computed on log returns, but the table shows simple returns (%) for readability. Returns are computed from the previous shared close to this one (for example, Friday → Monday includes weekend moves).

Days when both MRVL and CRDO had a big down day (2σ)

None in this window.

Days when MRVL had a big down day

Date (interval)	MRVL	CRDO
2025-05-07	-8.02%	+1.59%
2025-08-01	-7.37%	-3.58%
2025-08-29	-18.60%	-6.65%
2025-12-05 → 2025-12-08	-6.99%	+1.65%
2026-03-27 → 2026-03-30	-7.45%	-7.80%

Days when CRDO had a big down day

Date (interval)	MRVL	CRDO
2025-08-19	-6.09%	-10.48%
2025-10-14	-3.55%	-13.44%
2025-11-13	-2.03%	-10.85%
2026-02-04	-2.40%	-12.90%
2026-03-03	-4.14%	-14.81%
2026-03-17	-0.86%	-10.97%

Read this as “how ugly the ugly days get”, not as a precise forecast. One-year samples are small, so tail estimates are inherently noisy.

Full Comparison of Marvell vs. Credo (1-Year)

Metric	MRVL	CRDO
Total Return	+181.6%	+324.8%
Annualized Volatility	57.6%	81.8%
Sharpe Ratio	2.04	2.15
Sortino Ratio	3.29	3.47
Calmar Ratio	6.96	6.13
Sterling Ratio	9.74	12.20
Treynor Ratio	0.54	0.58
Ulcer Index	11.41%	22.02%
Max Drawdown	-26.4%	-53.6%
Avg Correlation to S&P 500	0.48	0.47
5% VaR (daily log return)	-4.27%	-7.50%
5% Expected Shortfall (CVaR)	-7.38%	-10.58%
Skew	-0.26	-0.06
Excess kurtosis	5.45	0.64
2σ tail days (down / up)	5 / 5	6 / 7

Audit this calculation

Formulas, inputs, and conventions used to compute the metrics on this page.

Inputs & conventions

Shared window for pair metrics: 2025-04-25 → 2026-04-23 (last shared close).
Rolling correlation sample (shared closes): 220 rolling 30-day values (from 249 shared daily returns).
Annualization (days/year): MRVL: 252 days/year; CRDO: 252 days/year.
Risk-free rate: Uses the 3-month U.S. Treasury yield (FRED: DGS3MO), averaged over each asset’s window:

MRVL: 4.17% over 2025-04-25 → 2026-04-23.

CRDO: 4.17% over 2025-04-25 → 2026-04-23.
Volatility drag (rule of thumb): Estimated from annualized volatility (simple returns). For the log-return framing, see Log returns.

MRVL: ≈ -16.6%/yr

CRDO: ≈ -33.5%/yr
Data alignment: No forward fill. Correlation and tail co-moves are computed on shared closes only.
For cross-calendar pairs (e.g., crypto vs stocks), weekend/holiday moves roll into the next shared close.
Return conventions: Volatility/Sharpe/Sortino use simple daily returns. Tail-risk uses daily log returns for distribution stats (but tables show simple returns). Log returns.

Formulas

Daily simple return

r_t = \frac{P_t}{P_{t-1}} - 1

Volatility

\sigma_{ann} = \sigma(r_t)\sqrt{A}

Volatility drag (approx.)

\text{drag} \approx \tfrac{1}{2}\sigma_{ann}^2

Sharpe Ratio

S = \frac{A\,\bar{r} - r_f}{\sigma(r_t)\sqrt{A}}

Sortino Ratio

So = \frac{A\,\bar{r} - r_f}{\sqrt{\mathbb{E}[\min(0,\,r_t - r_f/A)^2]}\,\sqrt{A}}

Maximum Drawdown

MDD = \min_t\left(\frac{P_t}{\max_{s \le t} P_s} - 1\right)

Average Correlation

\rho = \frac{\operatorname{cov}(r^A,\,r^B)}{\sigma_A\,\sigma_B}

Log returns

\ell_t = \ln\left(\frac{P_t}{P_{t-1}}\right)

Notation

$P_t$: Price on day t.
$r_t$: Simple daily return.
$\ell_t$: Log daily return.
$\bar{r}$: Average daily return.
$\sigma(r_t)$: Standard deviation of daily returns.
$A$: Annualization factor (days/year).
$r_f$: Annual risk-free rate.

Marvell vs Credo: Frequently Asked Questions

Which has higher volatility: MRVL or CRDO?

CRDO showed higher volatility at 81.8% annualized, compared to 57.6% for MRVL Over the past year. Higher volatility means larger price swings in both directions.

Does MRVL provide diversification when held with CRDO?

MRVL and CRDO are moderately correlated over the past year, with an average correlation of 0.43. This offers some diversification benefit, though they still tend to move together during major market moves.

How bad are the worst 5% days for MRVL vs CRDO?

Over the past year, MRVL's 5% VaR was -4.27% and its 5% Expected Shortfall was -7.38% (worst 13 days). CRDO's were -7.50% and -10.58% (worst 13 days).

Do MRVL and CRDO crash together on bad days?

On shared dates (n=249), when CRDO has a 2σ down day, MRVL also does 0.0% (0/6 days). In the other direction, when MRVL has one, CRDO also does 0.0% (0/5 days).

Which has better risk-adjusted returns: MRVL or CRDO?

CRDO showed better risk-adjusted performance with a Sharpe ratio of 2.15 versus MRVL's 2.04 Over the past year.

Can MRVL and CRDO be combined in a portfolio?

Yes, though allocation sizing matters. Their moderate correlation offers some diversification benefits. CRDO's higher volatility (81.8%) means even small allocations can materially impact overall portfolio risk.

Explore our financial glossary

Which is a better investment: MRVL or CRDO?

Share This Comparison of MRVL vs CRDO

Relative Performance of MRVL vs CRDO (Normalized to 100)

Trade MRVL or CRDO

Key Takeaways

Investment Comparison

Marvell vs Credo Performance Over Time

Marvell vs Credo Correlation

Drawdown

Marvell vs Credo Volatility (MRVL vs CRDO)

Risk-adjusted ratios

Sharpe Ratio of MRVL and CRDO

Sharpe Ratio: MRVL vs. CRDO

Sortino Ratio of MRVL and CRDO

Sortino Ratio: MRVL vs. CRDO

Calmar Ratio of MRVL and CRDO

Calmar Ratio: MRVL vs. CRDO

Sterling Ratio of MRVL and CRDO

Sterling Ratio: MRVL vs. CRDO

Treynor Ratio of MRVL and CRDO

Treynor Ratio: MRVL vs. CRDO

Ulcer Index of MRVL and CRDO

Ulcer Index: MRVL vs. CRDO

Tail Risk & Distribution Shape (1-Year): Marvell vs. Credo

Tail Risk & Distribution Shape: MRVL vs. CRDO (1-Year)

Downside co-moves (2σ) — 1-Year

Downside co-move map: MRVL vs. CRDO (2σ)

Days when both MRVL and CRDO had a big down day (2σ)

Days when MRVL had a big down day

Days when CRDO had a big down day

Full Comparison of Marvell vs. Credo (1-Year)

Inputs & conventions

Formulas

Marvell vs Credo: Frequently Asked Questions

Which has higher volatility: MRVL or CRDO?

Does MRVL provide diversification when held with CRDO?

How bad are the worst 5% days for MRVL vs CRDO?

Do MRVL and CRDO crash together on bad days?

Which has better risk-adjusted returns: MRVL or CRDO?

Can MRVL and CRDO be combined in a portfolio?