Which is a better investment: KTOS or PLTR?
Over the past year, KTOS outperformed PLTR. KTOS returned +95.1% compared with PLTR’s +25.5%. KTOS had the better risk-adjusted return, with a Sharpe ratio of 1.27 versus PLTR’s 0.62. PLTR was less volatile than KTOS, and PLTR had a smaller max drawdown than KTOS.
Metric winners: Total Return: KTOS; Sharpe Ratio: KTOS; Annualized Volatility: PLTR (less volatile); Max Drawdown: PLTR (smaller drawdown).
Relative Performance of KTOS vs PLTR (Normalized to 100)
Normalized to 100 at start date for comparison
Trade KTOS or PLTR
Access these assets on trusted platforms.
Key Takeaways
- Total Return: KTOS delivered a +95.1% total return, while PLTR returned +25.5% over the same period. KTOS outperformed on total returns.
- Risk-Adjusted Return (Sharpe Ratio): KTOS had a higher Sharpe (1.27 vs 0.62), indicating better risk-adjusted performance.
- Volatility (Annualized): KTOS was more volatile, with 68.0% annualized volatility, versus 52.8% for PLTR.
- Maximum Drawdown: PLTR's maximum drawdown was -38.2%, while KTOS experienced a deeper drawdown of -50.1%.
- Tail Risk (VaR & Expected Shortfall): At the 5% level (daily log returns), KTOS's VaR was -6.88% and its Expected Shortfall (CVaR) was -8.85%; PLTR's were -6.40% and -8.57%. VaR is the cutoff; Expected Shortfall is the average move on the worst days.
- Skew & Kurtosis: Skew: KTOS -0.10 vs PLTR -0.67. Excess kurtosis: KTOS 0.81 vs PLTR 1.66. Negative skew leans downside; higher excess kurtosis means fatter tails.
- Tail Days & Extremes: 2σ tail days (down/up): KTOS 6/7, PLTR 12/5. Worst day: KTOS -14.20% (2025-11-05) vs PLTR -12.05% (2025-05-06). Best day: KTOS +13.78% (2026-01-08) vs PLTR +8.81% (2025-11-10).
- Risk ratios: Sortino - KTOS: 1.93 vs. PLTR: 0.86 , Calmar - KTOS: 1.92 vs. PLTR: 0.67 , Sterling - KTOS: 2.12 vs. PLTR: 0.94 , Treynor - KTOS: 0.47 vs. PLTR: 0.17 , Ulcer Index - KTOS: 21.82% vs. PLTR: 17.38%
Investment Comparison
If you invested $10,000 in each asset on April 25, 2025:
Difference: $6,953.05 (KTOS ahead)
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions vs Palantir Technologies Performance Over Time
| Metric | KTOS | PLTR |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -15.4% | -8.5% |
| 90 Days | -40.6% | -16.5% |
| 180 Days | -28.1% | -23.3% |
| 1 Year | 95.1% | 25.5% |
Shorter time frames can show different leaders as market conditions change. Consider your investment horizon when comparing performance.
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions vs Palantir Technologies Correlation
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions and Palantir Technologies are moderately correlated over the past year. With a correlation of 0.36, these assets show moderate co-movement, offering some diversification when held together.
For portfolio construction, this moderate correlation offers some diversification benefit, though the assets still tend to move together during major market moves.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Current (30-day) | 0.51 |
| Average (full period) | 0.36 |
| Minimum (30-day rolling) | -0.34 |
| Maximum (30-day rolling) | 0.66 |
Correlation measures how closely two assets move together. Values near +1 indicate strong co-movement, near 0 indicates independence, and negative values indicate inverse movement. Current, minimum, and maximum figures are 30-day rolling correlations on shared daily returns.
Drawdown
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions experienced its maximum drawdown of -50.1% from 2026-01-16 to 2026-03-30. It has not yet recovered to its previous peak.
Palantir Technologies experienced its maximum drawdown of -38.2% from 2025-11-03 to 2026-04-10. It has not yet recovered to its previous peak.
Smaller drawdowns and faster recoveries indicate lower downside risk and greater resilience during market stress.
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions vs Palantir Technologies Volatility (KTOS vs PLTR)
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's 68.0% annualized volatility translates to about ±4.28% one-standard-deviation daily volatility.
Palantir Technologies's 52.8% annualized volatility translates to about ±3.32% one-standard-deviation daily volatility.
KTOS had the wider volatility profile over this window. That means its day-to-day return distribution was broader; PLTR was calmer, but lower volatility does not by itself mean better returns.
Treat the ± daily figure as a one-standard-deviation estimate from historical returns, not a forecast or expected absolute daily move. For context, 15-18% annualized volatility is roughly ±1% one-standard-deviation daily volatility.
Risk-adjusted ratios
Sharpe Ratio of KTOS and PLTR
Sharpe Ratio: KTOS vs. PLTR
Return per total volatilitySharpe gives us excess return per unit of risk. Upside and downside volatility both count as risk.
Sharpe ratio measures return per unit of risk (volatility). A higher Sharpe indicates better risk-adjusted performance. KTOS had a higher Sharpe (1.27 vs 0.62), indicating better risk-adjusted performance.
A Sharpe above 1.0 is generally considered good, above 2.0 is excellent. Negative Sharpe means the asset underperformed the risk-free rate. Calculated on each asset's full 365-day lookback of available prices and annualized using the asset calendar (365 for crypto, 252 trading days for equities/ETFs/metals).
Sortino Ratio of KTOS and PLTR
Sortino Ratio: KTOS vs. PLTR
Return per downside volatilitySortino keeps the return-over-risk idea, but only returns below the target rate count as volatility.
Sortino ratio measures return per unit of downside risk. Unlike Sharpe, it only counts downside deviation (returns below the target return). KTOS had better downside-adjusted returns.
A higher Sortino is better. It's useful when upside volatility is common (crypto is the obvious example). Downside deviation: KTOS 44.8% vs PLTR 38.4%. Calculated on each asset's full 365-day lookback of available prices, using the daily risk-free rate as the target return, and annualized using the asset calendar (365 for crypto, 252 trading days for equities/ETFs/metals).
Calmar Ratio of KTOS and PLTR
Calmar Ratio: KTOS vs. PLTR
CAGR per worst drawdownCalmar compares CAGR against the single deepest peak-to-trough loss over the period.
Calmar ratio compares CAGR to maximum drawdown. Higher Calmar means more return per unit of worst drawdown. KTOS posted the higher Calmar ratio.
Calmar is computed on each asset's full 365-day lookback and uses the max drawdown over that same window.
Sterling Ratio of KTOS and PLTR
Sterling Ratio: KTOS vs. PLTR
Return per average drawdownSterling smooths the drawdown penalty by using average drawdown events instead of only the worst one.
Sterling ratio measures excess return per unit of average drawdown (typically drawdowns worse than 10%). KTOS posted the higher Sterling ratio.
Sterling uses average drawdown events deeper than 10% and subtracts the risk-free rate to report excess return.
Treynor Ratio of KTOS and PLTR
Treynor Ratio: KTOS vs. PLTR
Excess return per market betaTreynor divides excess annualized return by beta — the sensitivity of the asset to broad-market moves. The slope shown is each asset’s beta vs SPY.
Treynor ratio measures excess return per unit of market risk (beta) instead of total volatility. KTOS posted the higher Treynor ratio.
Treynor uses beta vs the S&P 500 (SPY) on shared dates and the average 3-month Treasury rate as the risk-free rate.
Ulcer Index of KTOS and PLTR
Ulcer Index: KTOS vs. PLTR
Drawdown painUlcer Index is a risk index, not a return-over-risk ratio. Lower means smaller and shorter drawdowns.
Ulcer Index captures drawdown depth and duration. Lower Ulcer Index means less drawdown pain. PLTR had the lower Ulcer Index (less drawdown pain).
Ulcer Index is computed from each asset's drawdown series over the full lookback window.
Tail Risk & Distribution Shape (1-Year): Kratos Defense & Security Solutions vs. Palantir Technologies
This section looks at the shape of daily returns, not just the average. Tail stats are computed per asset on its own daily series (crypto includes weekends). We use daily log returns so multi-day moves add cleanly.
Definitions: Value at Risk (VaR), Expected Shortfall, skew, kurtosis, and fat tails.
Tail Risk & Distribution Shape: KTOS vs. PLTR (1-Year)
Actual daily return tailsThe bars are real daily log-return observations from the article window. Darker bars are observations at or beyond each asset’s 5% VaR cutoff.
| Metric (1-Year) | KTOS | PLTR |
|---|---|---|
| 5% VaR (daily log return) | -6.88% | -6.40% |
| 5% Expected Shortfall (CVaR) | -8.85% (worst 13 days) | -8.57% (worst 13 days) |
| Skew | -0.10 | -0.67 |
| Excess kurtosis | 0.81 | 1.66 |
| 2σ tail days (down / up) | 6 / 7 | 12 / 5 |
| Worst day | -14.20% (2025-11-05) | -12.05% (2025-05-06) |
| Best day | +13.78% (2026-01-08) | +8.81% (2025-11-10) |
Downside co-moves (2σ) — 1-Year
Computed on shared dates only (n=249). A “2σ downside move” means a shared-close log return more than 2 standard deviations below that asset’s own mean on this shared-date series. Dates below show simple returns (%) for readability.
Downside co-move map: KTOS vs. PLTR (2σ)
Shared-close daily returnsDots mark actual downside days: asset-colored dots are one-sided downside moves, and red dots are joint downside days. Grey dots add sampled shared-return context when available. The shaded lower-left zone shows where both KTOS and PLTR crossed their own 2σ downside threshold.
Show downside tail dates
Dates below are shared-date observations. The “Date” is the period end (close). Tail thresholds are computed on log returns, but the table shows simple returns (%) for readability. Returns are computed from the previous shared close to this one (for example, Friday → Monday includes weekend moves).
Days when both KTOS and PLTR had a big down day (2σ)
| Date (interval) | KTOS | PLTR |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-02-04 | -11.65% | -11.62% |
| 2026-04-09 | -8.23% | -7.30% |
Days when KTOS had a big down day
| Date (interval) | KTOS | PLTR |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-11-05 | -14.20% | -1.49% |
| 2026-02-04 | -11.65% | -11.62% |
| 2026-02-20 | -9.08% | +0.26% |
| 2026-03-20 | -8.79% | -3.21% |
| 2026-03-27 → 2026-03-30 | -9.26% | -3.85% |
| 2026-04-09 | -8.23% | -7.30% |
Days when PLTR had a big down day
| Date (interval) | KTOS | PLTR |
|---|---|---|
| 2025-05-06 | +0.98% | -12.05% |
| 2025-06-05 | +0.65% | -7.77% |
| 2025-06-27 | +10.91% | -9.37% |
| 2025-08-19 | -6.87% | -9.35% |
| 2025-10-03 | +1.22% | -7.47% |
| 2025-11-04 | -0.97% | -7.94% |
| 2025-11-06 | -6.46% | -6.84% |
| 2025-11-13 | -6.53% | -6.53% |
| 2026-02-04 | -11.65% | -11.62% |
| 2026-02-05 | -6.66% | -6.83% |
| 2026-04-09 | -8.23% | -7.30% |
| 2026-04-23 | -4.50% | -7.24% |
Read this as “how ugly the ugly days get”, not as a precise forecast. One-year samples are small, so tail estimates are inherently noisy.
Full Comparison of Kratos Defense & Security Solutions vs. Palantir Technologies (1-Year)
| Metric | KTOS | PLTR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return | +95.1% | +25.5% |
| Annualized Volatility | 68.0% | 52.8% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.27 | 0.62 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.93 | 0.86 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.92 | 0.67 |
| Sterling Ratio | 2.12 | 0.94 |
| Treynor Ratio | 0.47 | 0.17 |
| Ulcer Index | 21.82% | 17.38% |
| Max Drawdown | -50.1% | -38.2% |
| Avg Correlation to S&P 500 | 0.35 | 0.51 |
| 5% VaR (daily log return) | -6.88% | -6.40% |
| 5% Expected Shortfall (CVaR) | -8.85% | -8.57% |
| Skew | -0.10 | -0.67 |
| Excess kurtosis | 0.81 | 1.66 |
| 2σ tail days (down / up) | 6 / 7 | 12 / 5 |
Audit this calculation
Formulas, inputs, and conventions used to compute the metrics on this page.
Inputs & conventions
- Shared window for pair metrics
- 2025-04-25 → 2026-04-23 (last shared close).
- Rolling correlation sample (shared closes)
- 220 rolling 30-day values (from 249 shared daily returns).
- Annualization (days/year)
- KTOS: 252 days/year; PLTR: 252 days/year.
- Risk-free rate
- Uses the 3-month U.S. Treasury yield (FRED: DGS3MO), averaged over each asset’s window:
- KTOS: 4.17% over 2025-04-25 → 2026-04-23.
- PLTR: 4.17% over 2025-04-25 → 2026-04-23.
- Volatility drag (rule of thumb)
- Estimated from annualized volatility (simple returns). For the log-return framing, see Log returns.
- KTOS: ≈ -23.1%/yr
- PLTR: ≈ -13.9%/yr
- Data alignment
- No forward fill. Correlation and tail co-moves are computed on shared closes only. For cross-calendar pairs (e.g., crypto vs stocks), weekend/holiday moves roll into the next shared close.
- Return conventions
- Volatility/Sharpe/Sortino use simple daily returns. Tail-risk uses daily log returns for distribution stats (but tables show simple returns). Log returns.
Formulas
- Price on day t.
- Simple daily return.
- Log daily return.
- Average daily return.
- Standard deviation of daily returns.
- Annualization factor (days/year).
- Annual risk-free rate.
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions vs Palantir Technologies: Frequently Asked Questions
Which has higher volatility: KTOS or PLTR?
KTOS showed higher volatility at 68.0% annualized, compared to 52.8% for PLTR Over the past year. Higher volatility means larger price swings in both directions.
Does KTOS provide diversification when held with PLTR?
KTOS and PLTR are moderately correlated over the past year, with an average correlation of 0.36. This offers some diversification benefit, though they still tend to move together during major market moves.
How bad are the worst 5% days for KTOS vs PLTR?
Over the past year, KTOS's 5% VaR was -6.88% and its 5% Expected Shortfall was -8.85% (worst 13 days). PLTR's were -6.40% and -8.57% (worst 13 days).
Do KTOS and PLTR crash together on bad days?
On shared dates (n=249), when PLTR has a 2σ down day, KTOS also does 16.7% (2/12 days). In the other direction, when KTOS has one, PLTR also does 33.3% (2/6 days).
Which has better risk-adjusted returns: KTOS or PLTR?
KTOS showed better risk-adjusted performance with a Sharpe ratio of 1.27 versus PLTR's 0.62 Over the past year.
Can KTOS and PLTR be combined in a portfolio?
Yes, though allocation sizing matters. Their moderate correlation offers some diversification benefits. KTOS's higher volatility (68.0%) means even small allocations can materially impact overall portfolio risk.