Impact-Site-Verification: 0eedbe8d-4e05-4893-8456-85377301e322

Compare · ETH vs SOL · 2026

Ethereum vs Solana

A year of returns, risk, and volatility, compared.

Ethereum (ETH) and Solana (SOL) are compared across trailing return, volatility, drawdown, and risk-adjusted metrics.

Gale Finance Team
Written by Gale Finance Team
Sid Kalla
Reviewed by Sid Kalla CFA Charterholder

Ethereum, created in 2015 by Vitalik Buterin, first introduced the idea of using blockchains for Turing complete smart contracts, allowing developers to build permissionless apps. However, Ethereum suffered from scalability issues during its hypergrowth period, which allowed competitors to pitch "faster, cheaper, more scalable" blockchains. Ethereum's scaling solution, to increase throughput not at the base layer but via layer-2s, fragmented liquidity and created considerable hurdles to user experience and user acquisition. Each layer-2 felt like a siloed ecosystem rather than an integrated whole.

Solana, one of the projects that emerged in 2020 to take on this challenge, has seen a thriving ecosystem of apps and developers. It's vision is to scale the chain horizontally by increasing its throughput. While seemingly more centralized than Ethereum, Solana has been able to attract developers and build many successful protocols like pump.fun for memecoin launches. It has emerged as a strong competitor to Ethereum as the go-to smart contract platform.

Quick answer

Which is a better investment: ETH or SOL?

Over the past year, ETH outperformed SOL. ETH returned +30.5% compared with SOL’s -43.9%. ETH had the better risk-adjusted return, with a Sharpe ratio of 0.67 versus SOL’s -0.47. ETH was less volatile than SOL, and ETH had a smaller max drawdown than SOL.

Total Return
ETH +30.5%
SOL -43.9%
Sharpe Ratio
ETH 0.67
SOL -0.47
Annualized Volatility
ETH 71.8%
SOL 73.8%
Max Drawdown
ETH -61.5%
SOL -68.6%

Metric winners: Total Return: ETH; Sharpe Ratio: ETH; Annualized Volatility: ETH (less volatile); Max Drawdown: ETH (smaller drawdown).

ETH Total Return
+30.5%
SOL Total Return
-43.9%

Relative Performance of ETH vs SOL (Normalized to 100)

ETH SOL

Normalized to 100 at start date for comparison

Trade ETH or SOL

Access these assets on trusted platforms.

Affiliate disclosure

Key Takeaways

  • Total Return: ETH delivered a +30.5% total return, while SOL returned -43.9% over the same period. ETH outperformed on total returns.
  • Risk-Adjusted Return (Sharpe Ratio): SOL had a negative Sharpe (-0.47) while ETH was positive (0.67), indicating ETH had meaningfully better risk-adjusted performance in this period.
  • Volatility (Annualized): SOL was more volatile, with 73.8% annualized volatility, versus 71.8% for ETH.
  • Maximum Drawdown: ETH's maximum drawdown was -61.5%, while SOL experienced a deeper drawdown of -68.6%.
  • Tail Risk (VaR & Expected Shortfall): At the 5% level (daily log returns), ETH's VaR was -5.69% and its Expected Shortfall (CVaR) was -7.68%; SOL's were -6.03% and -8.52%. VaR is the cutoff; Expected Shortfall is the average move on the worst days.
  • Skew & Kurtosis: Skew: ETH 0.44 vs SOL -0.05. Excess kurtosis: ETH 2.81 vs SOL 1.13. Negative skew leans downside; higher excess kurtosis means fatter tails.
  • Tail Days & Extremes: 2σ tail days (down/up): ETH 8/9, SOL 9/10. Worst day: ETH -12.20% (2025-10-10) vs SOL -14.00% (2025-10-10). Best day: ETH +21.39% (2025-05-08) vs SOL +12.56% (2026-02-24).
  • Risk ratios: Sortino - ETH: 1.04 vs. SOL: -0.67 , Calmar - ETH: 0.50 vs. SOL: -0.64 , Sterling - ETH: 0.98 vs. SOL: -1.21 , Treynor - ETH: 0.22 vs. SOL: -0.22 , Ulcer Index - ETH: 33.13% vs. SOL: 39.78%

Investment Comparison

If you invested $10,000 in each asset on April 24, 2025:

ETH $13,054.78 +30.5%
SOL $5,611.83 -43.9%

Difference: $7,442.95 (ETH ahead)

Ethereum vs Solana Performance Over Time

Metric ETH SOL
30 Days 6.3% -6.8%
90 Days -21.9% -32.9%
180 Days -41.6% -55.9%
1 Year 30.5% -43.9%

Shorter time frames can show different leaders as market conditions change. Consider your investment horizon when comparing performance.

Ethereum vs Solana Correlation

Average Correlation
strongly correlated
0.87
Current (30-day) 0.80
30-day rolling range +0.58 to +0.97

Ethereum and Solana are strongly correlated over the past year. With a correlation of 0.87, these assets tend to move together, limiting diversification benefits.

For portfolio construction, this strong correlation means holding both ETH and SOL provides limited risk reduction — they're likely to decline together in downturns.

Metric Value
Current (30-day) 0.80
Average (full period) 0.87
Minimum (30-day rolling) 0.58
Maximum (30-day rolling) 0.97

Correlation measures how closely two assets move together. Values near +1 indicate strong co-movement, near 0 indicates independence, and negative values indicate inverse movement. Current, minimum, and maximum figures are 30-day rolling correlations on shared daily returns.

Drawdown

Maximum Drawdown
ETH
-61.5%
SOL
-68.6%

Ethereum experienced its maximum drawdown of -61.5% from 2025-08-22 to 2026-02-23. It has not yet recovered to its previous peak.

Solana experienced its maximum drawdown of -68.6% from 2025-09-18 to 2026-02-11. It has not yet recovered to its previous peak.

Smaller drawdowns and faster recoveries indicate lower downside risk and greater resilience during market stress.

Ethereum vs Solana Volatility (ETH vs SOL)

ETH Volatility
71.8%
±3.76% 1-day vol
SOL Volatility
73.8%
±3.86% 1-day vol
1-day volatility (1σ)
ETH
±3.76%
SOL
±3.86%

Ethereum's 71.8% annualized volatility translates to about ±3.76% one-standard-deviation daily volatility.

Solana's 73.8% annualized volatility translates to about ±3.86% one-standard-deviation daily volatility.

SOL had the wider volatility profile over this window. That means its day-to-day return distribution was broader; ETH was calmer, but lower volatility does not by itself mean better returns.

Treat the ± daily figure as a one-standard-deviation estimate from historical returns, not a forecast or expected absolute daily move. For context, 15-18% annualized volatility is roughly ±1% one-standard-deviation daily volatility.

Risk-adjusted ratios

Sharpe Ratio of ETH and SOL

Sharpe Ratio: ETH vs. SOL

Return per total volatility

Sharpe gives us excess return per unit of risk. Upside and downside volatility both count as risk.

Higher is better
Excess return Annualized volatility 0 100% vol 71.8% · excess +47.9% vol 73.8% · excess -34.9%
excess return / total volatility
Formula Sharpe=E[R]RfσR\displaystyle \mathrm{Sharpe} = \frac{\mathbb{E}[R] - R_f}{\sigma_R}

Sharpe ratio measures return per unit of risk (volatility). A higher Sharpe indicates better risk-adjusted performance. SOL had a negative Sharpe (-0.47) while ETH was positive (0.67), indicating ETH had meaningfully better risk-adjusted performance in this period.

A Sharpe above 1.0 is generally considered good, above 2.0 is excellent. Negative Sharpe means the asset underperformed the risk-free rate. Calculated on each asset's full 365-day lookback of available prices and annualized using the asset calendar (365 for crypto, 252 trading days for equities/ETFs/metals).

Sortino Ratio of ETH and SOL

Sortino Ratio: ETH vs. SOL

Return per downside volatility

Sortino keeps the return-over-risk idea, but only returns below the target rate count as volatility.

Higher is better
Frequency (days) Daily return (%) target -15.4% +22.8% 77 0
excess return / downside volatility
Formula Sortino=E[R]Rfσdown\displaystyle \mathrm{Sortino} = \frac{\mathbb{E}[R] - R_f}{\sigma_{\mathrm{down}}}

Sortino ratio measures return per unit of downside risk. Unlike Sharpe, it only counts downside deviation (returns below the target return). ETH had better downside-adjusted returns.

A higher Sortino is better. It's useful when upside volatility is common (crypto is the obvious example). Downside deviation: ETH 45.9% vs SOL 51.9%. Calculated on each asset's full 365-day lookback of available prices, using the daily risk-free rate as the target return, and annualized using the asset calendar (365 for crypto, 252 trading days for equities/ETFs/metals).

Calmar Ratio of ETH and SOL

Calmar Ratio: ETH vs. SOL

CAGR per worst drawdown

Calmar compares CAGR against the single deepest peak-to-trough loss over the period.

Higher is better
0% ETH +30.7% -61.5% SOL -44.0% -68.6%
CAGR / max drawdown
Formula Calmar=CAGRMaxDD\displaystyle \mathrm{Calmar} = \frac{\mathrm{CAGR}}{|\mathrm{MaxDD}|}

Calmar ratio compares CAGR to maximum drawdown. Higher Calmar means more return per unit of worst drawdown. ETH posted the higher Calmar ratio.

Calmar is computed on each asset's full 365-day lookback and uses the max drawdown over that same window.

Sterling Ratio of ETH and SOL

Sterling Ratio: ETH vs. SOL

Return per average drawdown

Sterling smooths the drawdown penalty by using average drawdown events instead of only the worst one.

Higher is better
0% -18% -36% -54% -72% 10% drawdown threshold
excess annual return / average deep drawdown
Formula Sterling=CAGRRfD>10%\displaystyle \mathrm{Sterling} = \frac{\mathrm{CAGR} - R_f}{\overline{D}_{>10\%}}

Sterling ratio measures excess return per unit of average drawdown (typically drawdowns worse than 10%). ETH posted the higher Sterling ratio.

Sterling uses average drawdown events deeper than 10% and subtracts the risk-free rate to report excess return.

Treynor Ratio of ETH and SOL

Treynor Ratio: ETH vs. SOL

Excess return per market beta

Treynor divides excess annualized return by beta — the sensitivity of the asset to broad-market moves. The slope shown is each asset’s beta vs SPY.

Higher is better
Asset return Market return 0 0 β 2.10 β 1.71
excess return / market beta
Formula Treynor=E[R]Rfβ\displaystyle \mathrm{Treynor} = \frac{\mathbb{E}[R] - R_f}{\beta}

Treynor ratio measures excess return per unit of market risk (beta) instead of total volatility. ETH posted the higher Treynor ratio.

Treynor uses beta vs the S&P 500 (SPY) on shared dates and the average 3-month Treasury rate as the risk-free rate.

Ulcer Index of ETH and SOL

Ulcer Index: ETH vs. SOL

Drawdown pain

Ulcer Index is a risk index, not a return-over-risk ratio. Lower means smaller and shorter drawdowns.

Lower is better
0% -18% -36% -54% -72%
root-mean-square drawdown
Formula UI=E[Dt2]\displaystyle \mathrm{UI} = \sqrt{\mathbb{E}[D_t^2]}

Ulcer Index captures drawdown depth and duration. Lower Ulcer Index means less drawdown pain. ETH had the lower Ulcer Index (less drawdown pain).

Ulcer Index is computed from each asset's drawdown series over the full lookback window.

Tail Risk & Distribution Shape (1-Year): Ethereum vs. Solana

This section looks at the shape of daily returns, not just the average. Tail stats are computed per asset on its own daily series (crypto includes weekends). We use daily log returns ln(PtPt1)\ln\left(\frac{P_t}{P_{t-1}}\right) so multi-day moves add cleanly.

Definitions: Value at Risk (VaR), Expected Shortfall, skew, kurtosis, and fat tails.

Tail Risk & Distribution Shape: ETH vs. SOL (1-Year)

Actual daily return tails

The bars are real daily log-return observations from the article window. Darker bars are observations at or beyond each asset’s 5% VaR cutoff.

Observed returns
ETH VaR 5% ES 5% SOL VaR 5% ES 5% -22.4% 0% +22.4% Daily log return
VaR marks the 5th percentile loss cutoff; Expected Shortfall averages the observations beyond that cutoff.
Formula VaR5%=Q0.05(rt),ES5%=E[rtrtVaR5%]\displaystyle \mathrm{VaR}_{5\%}=Q_{0.05}(r_t),\quad \mathrm{ES}_{5\%}=\mathbb{E}[r_t\mid r_t\le \mathrm{VaR}_{5\%}]
Metric (1-Year) ETH SOL
5% VaR (daily log return) -5.69% -6.03%
5% Expected Shortfall (CVaR) -7.68% (worst 19 days) -8.52% (worst 19 days)
Skew 0.44 -0.05
Excess kurtosis 2.81 1.13
2σ tail days (down / up) 8 / 9 9 / 10
Worst day -12.20% (2025-10-10) -14.00% (2025-10-10)
Best day +21.39% (2025-05-08) +12.56% (2026-02-24)

Downside co-moves (2σ) — 1-Year

Computed on shared dates only (n=364). A “2σ downside move” means a shared-close log return more than 2 standard deviations below that asset’s own mean on this shared-date series. Dates below show simple returns (%) for readability.

Downside co-move map: ETH vs. SOL (2σ)

Shared-close daily returns

Dots mark actual downside days: asset-colored dots are one-sided downside moves, and red dots are joint downside days. Grey dots add sampled shared-return context when available. The shaded lower-left zone shows where both ETH and SOL crossed their own 2σ downside threshold.

-2σ SOL -2σ ETH Joint downside zone -17.2% 0% +17.2% +14.8% 0% -14.8% SOL daily log return ETH daily log return
Show downside tail dates

Dates below are shared-date observations. The “Date” is the period end (close). Tail thresholds are computed on log returns, but the table shows simple returns (%) for readability. Returns are computed from the previous shared close to this one (for example, Friday → Monday includes weekend moves).

Days when both ETH and SOL had a big down day (2σ)

Date (interval) ETH SOL
2025-08-25 -8.30% -9.08%
2025-10-10 -12.20% -14.00%
2025-11-03 -7.91% -11.36%
2026-01-30 -10.58% -11.27%
2026-02-04 -11.38% -12.17%

Days when ETH had a big down day

Date (interval) ETH SOL
2025-06-05 -7.23% -5.85%
2025-08-25 -8.30% -9.08%
2025-10-10 -12.20% -14.00%
2025-11-03 -7.91% -11.36%
2025-11-04 -8.44% -6.28%
2026-01-19 -7.95% -5.47%
2026-01-30 -10.58% -11.27%
2026-02-04 -11.38% -12.17%

Days when SOL had a big down day

Date (interval) ETH SOL
2025-07-23 -3.12% -7.65%
2025-08-25 -8.30% -9.08%
2025-09-25 -6.88% -9.18%
2025-10-10 -12.20% -14.00%
2025-11-03 -7.91% -11.36%
2025-11-11 -4.15% -7.88%
2026-01-30 -10.58% -11.27%
2026-02-03 -5.35% -7.72%
2026-02-04 -11.38% -12.17%

Read this as “how ugly the ugly days get”, not as a precise forecast. One-year samples are small, so tail estimates are inherently noisy.

Full Comparison of Ethereum vs. Solana (1-Year)

Metric ETH SOL
Total Return +30.5% -43.9%
Annualized Volatility 71.8% 73.8%
Sharpe Ratio 0.67 -0.47
Sortino Ratio 1.04 -0.67
Calmar Ratio 0.50 -0.64
Sterling Ratio 0.98 -1.21
Treynor Ratio 0.22 -0.22
Ulcer Index 33.13% 39.78%
Max Drawdown -61.5% -68.6%
Avg Correlation to S&P 500 0.47 0.40
5% VaR (daily log return) -5.69% -6.03%
5% Expected Shortfall (CVaR) -7.68% -8.52%
Skew 0.44 -0.05
Excess kurtosis 2.81 1.13
2σ tail days (down / up) 8 / 9 9 / 10
Audit this calculation

Formulas, inputs, and conventions used to compute the metrics on this page.

Inputs & conventions

Shared window for pair metrics
2025-04-24 → 2026-04-23 (last shared close).
Rolling correlation sample (shared closes)
335 rolling 30-day values (from 364 shared daily returns).
Annualization (days/year)
ETH: 365 days/year; SOL: 365 days/year.
Risk-free rate
Uses the 3-month U.S. Treasury yield (FRED: DGS3MO), averaged over each asset’s window:
  • ETH: 4.17% over 2025-04-24 → 2026-04-23.
  • SOL: 4.17% over 2025-04-24 → 2026-04-23.
Volatility drag (rule of thumb)
Estimated from annualized volatility (simple returns). For the log-return framing, see Log returns.
  • ETH: ≈ -25.8%/yr
  • SOL: ≈ -27.2%/yr
Data alignment
No forward fill. Correlation and tail co-moves are computed on shared closes only.
For cross-calendar pairs (e.g., crypto vs stocks), weekend/holiday moves roll into the next shared close.
Return conventions
Volatility/Sharpe/Sortino use simple daily returns. Tail-risk uses daily log returns for distribution stats (but tables show simple returns). Log returns.

Formulas

Daily simple return
rt=PtPt11r_t = \frac{P_t}{P_{t-1}} - 1
σann=σ(rt)A\sigma_{ann} = \sigma(r_t)\sqrt{A}
drag12σann2\text{drag} \approx \tfrac{1}{2}\sigma_{ann}^2
S=Arˉrfσ(rt)AS = \frac{A\,\bar{r} - r_f}{\sigma(r_t)\sqrt{A}}
So=ArˉrfE[min(0,rtrf/A)2]ASo = \frac{A\,\bar{r} - r_f}{\sqrt{\mathbb{E}[\min(0,\,r_t - r_f/A)^2]}\,\sqrt{A}}
MDD=mint(PtmaxstPs1)MDD = \min_t\left(\frac{P_t}{\max_{s \le t} P_s} - 1\right)
ρ=cov(rA,rB)σAσB\rho = \frac{\operatorname{cov}(r^A,\,r^B)}{\sigma_A\,\sigma_B}
t=ln(PtPt1)\ell_t = \ln\left(\frac{P_t}{P_{t-1}}\right)
Notation
PtP_t
Price on day t.
rtr_t
Simple daily return.
t\ell_t
Log daily return.
rˉ\bar{r}
Average daily return.
σ(rt)\sigma(r_t)
Standard deviation of daily returns.
AA
Annualization factor (days/year).
rfr_f
Annual risk-free rate.

Ethereum vs Solana: Frequently Asked Questions

Which has higher volatility: ETH or SOL?

SOL showed higher volatility at 73.8% annualized, compared to 71.8% for ETH Over the past year. Higher volatility means larger price swings in both directions.

Does ETH provide diversification when held with SOL?

ETH and SOL are strongly correlated over the past year, with an average correlation of 0.87. This strong correlation limits diversification benefits.

How bad are the worst 5% days for ETH vs SOL?

Over the past year, ETH's 5% VaR was -5.69% and its 5% Expected Shortfall was -7.68% (worst 19 days). SOL's were -6.03% and -8.52% (worst 19 days).

Do ETH and SOL crash together on bad days?

On shared dates (n=364), when SOL has a 2σ down day, ETH also does 55.6% (5/9 days). In the other direction, when ETH has one, SOL also does 62.5% (5/8 days).

Which has better risk-adjusted returns: ETH or SOL?

SOL had a negative Sharpe (-0.47) while ETH was positive (0.67) Over the past year, indicating ETH had meaningfully better risk-adjusted performance.

Can ETH and SOL be combined in a portfolio?

Yes, though allocation sizing matters. Their strong correlation provides limited risk reduction since they tend to move together. SOL's higher volatility (73.8%) means even small allocations can materially impact overall portfolio risk.

Explore our financial glossary